Comment #1 on issue 4010 by [email protected]: Chord repeats should not
repeat forced/cautionary accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4010
On 13/07/14 15:43, David Kastrup wrote:
Kieren MacMillan <[email protected]> writes:
Hi all,
"chord repeats should not repeat forced/cautionary accidentals".
That's pretty straightforward.
Of course [because it's 'common sense'], I agree this should be the
default behaviour...
But I think it would be nice if there were still a way to override
that, e.g., q! and q? to repeat the accidentals.
I don't see that this makes sense.
<a! cis d?> q!
is going to be what?
<a cis d> q?
is going to be what?
At some point of time, one just has to accept that q is a shorthand.
Once it becomes hard figuring out the proper semantics, we are leaving
the shorthand realm.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
