Comment #2 on issue 4010 by [email protected]: Chord repeats should not
repeat forced/cautionary accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4010
On 13/07/14 19:21, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi David,
At some point of time, one just has to accept that q is a shorthand.
Once it becomes hard figuring out the proper semantics, we are leaving
the shorthand realm.
Point taken...
But to imply that coming up with a logically consistent interpretation of
each possibility is disingenuous. Here's one obvious option:
q repeats the previous chord, with cautionary or forced accidentals
not reindicated
q! repeats the previous chord, reindicating any forced accidentals
q? repeats the previous chord, reindicating any cautionary
accidentals
q!? repeats the previous chord, reindicating any forced accidentals
or cautionary accidentals.
So, in your specific examples:
<a! cis d?> q!
is going to be what?
The same output as
<a! cis d?> <a! cis d>
<a cis d> q?
is going to be what?
The same output as
<a cis d> <a cis d>
Cheers,
Kieren.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
