Graham Percival escreveu: > The docs are generally ok, but I'd like to take another look at the new > Program Usage manual. Again, I expect to be done by the end of August. > I'm not certain if the translators want to look at this before 2.12 > comes out.
OK - I will be traveling the 1st weeks of september, so it's unlikely that a stable release will happen before the beginning of October. > I'd like to have a longer period between "almost ready" and "released". > This is partly to gather more bug reports before the .0 release, but I'm not sure if this a good goal. We already have plenty of bugreports :) The idea is that we want to move people away from 2.10, and which we can do if 2.11 no regressions. Fixing other bugs is a lofty goal, but should only delay the release if they are really serious. > also so that we can update LSR and move snippets into LSR. My personal > ideal is to have a completely empty input/new/ directory structure for > the .0 release. This probably isn't feasible, because the version of > lilypond in LSR needs to be updated to 2.12-rc, then we need to add all > these snippets and make sure everything still works. > A more realistic goal is to clear out input/new/ by the 12.2.2 release > -- we update LSR for .0, then start adding snippets. This takes two or > three weeks, and in the mean time we fix some previously-unreported > regressions and release .1. Shouldn't LSR start supporting 2.11 now? Then we can have a 'finished' 2.12 LSR by the time we release 2.12. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
