Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Graham Percival escreveu:
OK - I will be traveling the 1st weeks of september, so it's unlikely that
a stable release will happen before the beginning of October.
That sounds perfect.
I'd like to have a longer period between "almost ready" and "released".
This is partly to gather more bug reports before the .0 release, but
I'm not sure if this a good goal. We already have plenty of bugreports :)
The idea is that we want to move people away from 2.10, and which we can do
if 2.11 no regressions. Fixing other bugs is a lofty goal, but should only
delay the release if they are really serious.
I was thinking of regressions. I'm sure that we're going to find some
after we release .12, but it would be nice if it was a smaller number
than it might otherwise be. :)
A more realistic goal is to clear out input/new/ by the 12.2.2 release
-- we update LSR for .0, then start adding snippets. This takes two or
three weeks, and in the mean time we fix some previously-unreported
regressions and release .1.
Shouldn't LSR start supporting 2.11 now? Then we can have a 'finished'
2.12 LSR by the time we release 2.12.
It's a question of 2.10 or 2.11 -- we'd have to drop 2.10, which might
result in broken snippets. OTOH, this is a great way to do more
regression tests. I'm thinking about asking if Sebastiano can update it
in early Sep.
Cheers,
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
