On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 09:40:28 +0200 "Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/4/21 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I think there's a bug in your version of git. For some reason, > > the commit doesn't include a @lilypond example. And I'm *certain* > > that you wouldn't forget to include such an example, given that > > it's one the big hot topics of work on Text these days. > > I thought the > @lilypond > command had be renamed to: > @c TODO: Let Neil come up with an example Not for new \markup commands. And as soon as you get the category infrastructure implemented (in a clean way), I'll start complaining if programmers add \markup commands without giving them categories. -- actually, it might therefore be better to add the "category" field to define-markup-command (or build-markup or whatever it's called) *without* using an optional argument. That would force programmers to give them a category (even if the category is simply "other"), which is exactly what we want. > OK, I'm adding one right now -- please note that I didn't forget > @cindex entries, though. Trust me, I would have complained about that if you had. :) Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
