2008/4/21 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > -- actually, it might therefore be better to add the "category" > field to define-markup-command (or build-markup or whatever it's > called) *without* using an optional argument. That would force > programmers to give them a category (even if the category is > simply "other"), which is exactly what we want.
I'd prefer to (but it's just because I can't handle the code otherwise ;) However, don't we risk a major breakage if doing so? Cheers, Valentin _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
