On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 6:30 PM, John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2008/07/15 23:00 +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote: >> I can only repeat that IMHO it would be best to distribute the final >> fonts to reduce the dependencies. > > Let's do this if there is no objection. This certainly involves calling > 'make -C mf' at the beginning of 'make dist', and packing generated > fonts into the tarball. I've added this to my to-do list for this > summer (I like hacking makefiles, so that's not a problem :-).
Hi, I oppose to this idea. I would rather completely stop distributing tarballs. Git clone is a more efficient way of distributing source code. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
