It's a bit of a halfbaked solution. If you don't want to compile lily, why not use the pre-rolled binary.
Also, it would be nice if some of these perverse hackers could just add an autoconf check for said program. On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> FWIW I also like the idea of having less dependencies, but not at >> the price of being unable to hack the source. Even if that is the >> source to a font. > > Well, adding pre-compiled fonts to the tarball just remove a > dependency. As soon as you remove the fonts, they are rebuilt. > Where's the problem? > -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
