Le mardi 12 janvier 2010 à 12:31 +0000, Graham Percival a écrit : > now that John's > updated stable, I need to drop that work and start figuring out how to > get GUB to make 2.12.3-2.
Why not releasing a 2.12.4 instead? Revision numbers (third number of the version number) are cheap, aren't they, and release numbers (-0, -1, -2 etc.) are only supposed to denote a difference between different builds of the *same* sources (i.e. same Git committish of LilyPond sources branch), aren't they? It must also save you work on GUB or at least put down its priority so you can work on more urgent tasks. Cheers, John
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
