On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 02:24:58PM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le mercredi 13 janvier 2010 à 12:20 +0000, Graham Percival a écrit :
> > Also, please
> > use @q{} in the @section name.
> > ... actually, could we just sidestep the whole issue by removing the
> > quotes entirely? "@node Using lily-git" seems easy enough for me.
>
> I agree, but if Mark wants to be picky, he could write
>
> @*section Using @command{lily-git}
Yes. In case people are confused, this would be
@node Using lily-git
@section Using @command{lily-git}
> Anyway, using "@command{lily-git}" rather than anything else in the
> running text is highly recommended.
Yes.
> > - pushing to `blah blah': again, I'm not wild about the quotes. Also,
> > I'd suggest changing it to "Pushing to origin";
>
> Why not "Pushing to @code{origin}"?
Notwithstanding the lily-git suggestion, I'm not wild about having
different @node / @section names. Anybody reading this far into
git will know that "origin" is a special git term, so "Pushing to
origin" is probably clear enough.
I wouldn't object to "Pushing to @code{origin}", but if I were
writing it, I'd stick to plain text. At least in the @section
title; in the running text I'd use @code{origin}, of course.
Cheers,
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
