On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 02:27:09PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote: > 2010/4/16 Graham Percival <[email protected]>: > > My git history looks a bit weird (I think I forgot to push at the > > right time), and a quick check indicates that the fix to 1027 (a doc > > fix added a few days ago) wasn't included. > > I rebased (instead of pulling) and now we have some repeated commits > in lilypond/translation.
I'm not concerned about the release (any missing bugfixes will be in .19 anyway), but does this matter for the commit history? I mean, we had a week of git not-really-working while Jan made multiple different versions of the repository; would something like that be required in the future? Or does it only affect lilypond/translation, which we don't look at the stats for? Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
