On 4/17/10 7:08 AM, "Graham Percival" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 02:27:09PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> 2010/4/16 Graham Percival <[email protected]>:
>>> My git history looks a bit weird (I think I forgot to push at the
>>> right time), and a quick check indicates that the fix to 1027 (a doc
>>> fix added a few days ago) wasn't included.
>>
>> I rebased (instead of pulling) and now we have some repeated commits
>> in lilypond/translation.
>
> I'm not concerned about the release (any missing bugfixes will be
> in .19 anyway), but does this matter for the commit history? I
> mean, we had a week of git not-really-working while Jan made
> multiple different versions of the repository; would something
> like that be required in the future?
It looks to me like we have lots of duplicated commits on master.
But I'm not a git expert.
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
