2010/4/17 Graham Percival <[email protected]>: > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 02:27:09PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote: >> 2010/4/16 Graham Percival <[email protected]>: >> > My git history looks a bit weird (I think I forgot to push at the >> > right time), and a quick check indicates that the fix to 1027 (a doc >> > fix added a few days ago) wasn't included. >> >> I rebased (instead of pulling) and now we have some repeated commits >> in lilypond/translation. > > I'm not concerned about the release (any missing bugfixes will be > in .19 anyway), but does this matter for the commit history?
Not too much. Just a bit of noise. You know, there is not a big flashing caption telling you what branch are you in, but there are tools that help on keeping oriented. > I > mean, we had a week of git not-really-working while Jan made > multiple different versions of the repository; would something > like that be required in the future? Something like what exactly? Our latest repo works fine for me and my habits have not changed. > Or does it only affect lilypond/translation, which we don't look > at the stats for? In the long term, stats for all branches are identical as long as they got merged periodically. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
