I would have liked to see this in codereview before it showed up in git master.
changes.tely: - why is \include "still recommended"? pitches.itely: - if \include is still recommended, then why is \language discussed first? - I see a @noindent, which is heavily discouraged by the doc policy. - I see @exmaples, which are also discouraged by the doc policy. - does \language support scoping? If so, it would be nice to see that discussed. - perhaps we should not consider arabic.ly as a "language", but rather as an "instrument (or music) style", like bagpipes.ly or gregorian.ly. If so, then this is the appropriate time to discuss it. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
