On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Neil Puttock <[email protected]> wrote: > On 24 October 2010 12:32, Valentin Villenave <[email protected]> wrote: >> Feel free to revert it. > > TBH, I'm sorely tempted to myself.
Then please do. > There's a memory leak from `make-void-music', which suggests you > haven't done a regression test check or run make doc. I have not, since the new function isn't used anywhere. I didn't suspect a stupid music-function hack that is not invoked anywhere could cause such things. ... Indeed, it can. > I don't think it's appropriate to gulp files and evaluate code for > this. I never said it was. The only point was to make the patch as unnoticeable as possible, in order to get it accepted. > The pitch alists should be moved to a single file instead, so > they're resident, leaving the existing language files as skeletons > until they're removed. No kidding. And we could name this new single file, I don't know, lang-init.ly for example? (sigh) OK. Reverting. Better luck next time (if there is a next time, which I doubt)... Cheers, Valentin. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
