On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Trevor Daniels <[email protected]> wrote:
> OK; I agree. Patch looks good.
Thanks! I've pushed this patch, and merged translation onto master
(Francisco, I'll let you have a look in case I forgot something!).
> Ideally, yes. But who is going to look manually through
> all the docs?
Er... Hello? :-) What do you think I've been doing for the past week or so? :)
> Better to do it automatically first, then
> fix up any that stand out as poor when we notice them.
It's even easier; I can automatically grep @file{} entries that are
longer than n characters, then manually decide what to do with each
one individually.
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:21 PM, Trevor Daniels <[email protected]> wrote:
> No <smile> I was just suggesting better English, but the spacing
> went awry - "that" should have been under "who" - "Long entries are
> those /that/ contain ...". (You once asked us to do that, IIRC :)
Oh, thanks! I do tend to get confused between these: "the people who",
"the things that", "the things which" (does "which" even work with
plural?).
Thanks!
Valentin.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
