On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Trevor Daniels <[email protected]> wrote: > > I don't think that was unreasonable. This was correcting > an equally big patch which we all agreed was wrong, and > which was already in master. It was equivalent to reverting > the bad patch, but without destroying the good bits within > it. Both Carl and I had approved it.
Once bitten, twice shy. I would have been happier if the patch had been up for review for at least 24 hours, to give developer in all time zones a chance to comment. I've asked Carl and Mark to delay pushing patches for that reason -- even when the patch had already gone through 5 revisions! If there is a hint of contention, then it seems to me that 24 hours is not a long time to wait. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
