On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 04:15:43PM +0000, Carl Sorensen wrote: > > On Dec 17, 2011, at 6:54 AM, "Phil Holmes" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On the tracker, we use labels to categorise issues. Is there any reason we > > shouldn't use a specific label just for patches ("Patch")? This will make > > it clearer to the Bug Squad how to verify - those labelled patch are > > verified with a commitish, those without by checking the result. > > What do you consider a "patch"? Your terminology is not clear to me.
Dunno about Phil, but I'd define it as "an issue which has no Tiny example". Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
