On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 06:21:45PM +0000, Carl Sorensen wrote: > On 12/17/11 10:31 AM, "Graham Percival" <[email protected]> wrote: > >Dunno about Phil, but I'd define it as "an issue which has no Tiny > >example". > > How about doc revisions? They have no tiny example. Do we want to make > sure the changes have made it to the binary distribution, or is it > sufficient to say they have been pushed to master?
I'd argue that the explanation of the change is a Tiny example, or at least close enough for this purpose. > To me, the type should be something like "No visible output" or "Verify > commit only", instead of "Patch" Sounds ok to me. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
