----- Original Message -----
From: "Carl Sorensen" <[email protected]>
To: "Phil Holmes" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Devel" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2011 4:15 PM
Subject: Re: Labelling of patches
On Dec 17, 2011, at 6:54 AM, "Phil Holmes" <[email protected]> wrote:
On the tracker, we use labels to categorise issues. Is there any reason
we shouldn't use a specific label just for patches ("Patch")? This will
make it clearer to the Bug Squad how to verify - those labelled patch are
verified with a commitish, those without by checking the result.
What do you consider a "patch"? Your terminology is not clear to me.
Carl
I would be happy with "an issue which has been raised by pushing a patch to
Rietveld with git-cl"; an alternative would be an issue where the only
simple way to verify is to check the commitish has been pushed - but for
simplicity would go with the first.
--
Phil Holmes
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
