On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 10:17:26AM +0200, John Mandereau wrote: > Il giorno gio, 30/08/2012 alle 08.57 +0100, Trevor Daniels ha scritto: > > I don't think the patch for this issue should have been tested. > > It has been marked 'patch-needs-work' since 29 May. > > It should have been marked Patch-abandoned then (BTW isn't there an > script that is supposed to automate this?), and the recent comments > should have been accompanied by a status change to Started.
There's no script. Colin Campbell occasionally does it manually. That said, I don't think that Grenouille should be testing Patch-needs_work. Only Patch-new really needs testing, with the possible addition of some new item like Patch-needs_help. I'm working on a proposal for a clear discussion about patches, Grenouille, and testing; incorporating labels such as Patch-test-doc. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
