On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 02:54:11PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote: > Il giorno ven, 31/08/2012 alle 13.21 +0100, Graham Percival ha scritto: > > People like James can build new test results quite quickly, > > have them automatically uploaded to Grenouille, and Grenouille > > can then server them to reviewers. > > I'm a bit afraid of the extra bandwidth this will use, but we probably > have no other solution for the next days (or more... as long as > Grenouille has these too frequent crashes), and it's up to me to make > Patchy not bloat up too much all tests results with so many log > files :-p
Right. Based on a rough estimate of the filesizes that I've seen James post, let's assume 1M for a normal patch and 10M for a large touch-everything patch. Let's also assume that each day has 10 normal patches and 1 large patch. That means 20 Mb upload per day, or 600 Mb per month. Let's guess at 10 views per patch (possibly the same reviewer looking at the data a few times), and that's 6 Gb download (given the generous over-estimates). Unless I've screwed up the math somewhere. (granted, this doesn't count bandwidth for translators looking at documentation) That's probably ok for a server. It would be be nice if it were smaller, of course, but it doesn't strike me as being ridiculously large. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
