Hello, On 31 August 2012 14:09, Graham Percival <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 02:54:11PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote: >> Il giorno ven, 31/08/2012 alle 13.21 +0100, Graham Percival ha scritto: >> > People like James can build new test results quite quickly, >> > have them automatically uploaded to Grenouille, and Grenouille >> > can then server them to reviewers. >> >> I'm a bit afraid of the extra bandwidth this will use, but we probably >> have no other solution for the next days (or more... as long as >> Grenouille has these too frequent crashes), and it's up to me to make >> Patchy not bloat up too much all tests results with so many log >> files :-p > > Right. Based on a rough estimate of the filesizes that I've seen > James post, let's assume 1M for a normal patch and 10M for a large > touch-everything patch. Let's also assume that each day has 10 > normal patches and 1 large patch.
I'll need to double check remember that I post links to zipped files. I never checked the size of the show-xxxx regtest dir that gets created. That might be larger although I cannot imagine that png files compress that much more but the logs that sometimes get included in reg test files might be significant. james _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
