John Mandereau wrote Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:17 AM
> Il giorno gio, 30/08/2012 alle 08.57 +0100, Trevor Daniels ha scritto: >> I don't think the patch for this issue should have been tested. >> It has been marked 'patch-needs-work' since 29 May. > > It should have been marked Patch-abandoned then (BTW isn't there an > script that is supposed to automate this?), It wasn't abandoned. The patch was basically good, it just needed more work. > and the recent comments > should have been accompanied by a status change to Started. At the time I hadn't decided to work on it. As of today I have decided to work on it, so I shall change the status and take ownership. I don't need any more tests until I upload a further patch, though. Trevor _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
