On Nov 3, 2013, at 2:00 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 03/11/13 13:36, Mike Solomon wrote: >> Doesn’t work, but all the files in flower compile fine with gcc, so I’m a >> happy camper. >> Apple’s home cooked clang is not free software, so there’s no reason to >> expect free software to compile with it. I don’t mind giving up on it. > > It's difficult to see how they could have cooked it to the point where what > is AFAICS fairly standard C/C++ fails to compile with it. > > Anyway, if you want to leave it here, no worries. I just thought it might be > useful for other people if we could tie down what the source of the problem > is. > > Just for reference, do you have a log of what happens when you try running > ./configure with CC=clang and CXX=clang++? > Same exact problem with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. It’s not that I want to leave it here, but rather that I need to spend time engraving. When I have time, I’ll try to make a minimal example and send it to Apple. Cheers, MS _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
