On Nov 3, 2013, at 1:50 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Mike Solomon <m...@mikesolomon.org> writes: > >> Apple’s home cooked clang is not free software, so there’s no reason >> to expect free software to compile with it. > > Non sequitur. There is nothing wrong with trying to bring some more > taste of free software to people in the Apple jails. Now there are > alternative means, so it's not high urgency. In particular, if you are > the only person we've heard of so far and already moved to an > alternative: we run into danger of putting in a lot of work for purely > imaginary users.
It took me 15 minutes of work to compile with g++. I can’t imagine that anyone who knows what they’re doing (TM) won’t be able to figure this out in a reasonable timeframe unless they have a seriously messed up computer. > >> I don’t mind giving up on it. > > Shrug. At any rate, it would be important to get some feedback > regarding installation of the stock LilyPond binary distribution on the > newest OSX. It would be good if that worked before we put out 2.18. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-10/msg00897.html Cheers, MS
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
