Mike Solomon <[email protected]> writes: > Apple’s home cooked clang is not free software, so there’s no reason > to expect free software to compile with it.
Non sequitur. There is nothing wrong with trying to bring some more taste of free software to people in the Apple jails. Now there are alternative means, so it's not high urgency. In particular, if you are the only person we've heard of so far and already moved to an alternative: we run into danger of putting in a lot of work for purely imaginary users. > I don’t mind giving up on it. Shrug. At any rate, it would be important to get some feedback regarding installation of the stock LilyPond binary distribution on the newest OSX. It would be good if that worked before we put out 2.18. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
