Dan Eble <[email protected]> writes: > On Nov 15, 2013, at 09:37 , David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I would expect that physical limitations of the execution of a >> particular instrument would be the task of the MIDI expander, with the >> MIDI signal being mostly instrument-independent (apart from preselecting >> a particular instrument). > > That is an argument against adding any overlap, right?
Uh, no? If that's the usual representation of slurs in MIDI, why would it? It's probably not spelled out hard in any standard, but I expect that there are some de facto standards used for MIDI play. I have no significant experience with MIDI, so I have no actual knowledge about established representations of articulations. But I'm pretty confident that this is an area where LilyPond should try following conventions, so they exist, rather than being inventive. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
