Just that Devon does not get a wrong impression: I applaud every effort to make LilyPond's MIDI output better reflect its input, and this work is a great step in that direction.
Dan, however, suggests to make LilyPond's output to reflect not the music but an imaginary performance by a human player, making the MIDI worse suitable for proofhearing. And that's a direction that makes no sense, because there is other specialized software for that job. LilyPond's MIDI output is intended to convey information, not emotion. It would be an ambitious task to "properly" convey "con fuoco" or "molto triste" like a human player would, but the MIDI way would be to crank up or down the speed and the expression controller. https://codereview.appspot.com/26470047/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
