On Nov 17, 2013, at 01:30 , David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote:
> It can serve as a proofhearing aid or a practice aid.  It is not
> intended to serve as a substitute for a player when recording.  For
> that, LilyPond produces sheet music fit for running through a human.

This rebuttal counters what I never claimed as a goal.  Didn’t I express my 
belief that going overboard with simulation was not worth the trouble because 
no amount of tweaking the MIDI would make the final synthesized result natural 
enough for my taste?
— 
Dan



_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to