On Aug 25, 2014, at 00:11 , Dan Eble <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Aug 24, 2014, at 20:25 , Keith OHara <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 23 Aug 2014 13:16:22 -0700, Dan Eble <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Your previous approach with the SpecialVoiceGroup seemed more promising, if
>> that group includes only the separate voices for each part, and if you move
>> the accidental_engraver to that group.
>
> Thank you for saying that. It inspired me go back and try something I hadn’t
> before (\hide NoteHead), and this time I see no visual problems so far. (I
> should test that accidentals work properly on tied notes.) Would you expect
> \hide NoteHead to cause any noticeable artifacts?
I did have to add the Tie_engraver. Now I’m working on the last issue that I’m
aware of:
programming error: note column without heads and stem
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: Note_column without first_head()
continuing, cross fingers
A simplified example follows. How should I interpret these? Is there
something genuinely wrong with the approach? Are the messages overzealous? I
see no visual problems in the real score from which this example is derived.
Thanks for your help.
—
Dan
\version "2.18.0"
\layout {
\context {
\Staff
\accepts "SpecialVoice"
}
\context {
\name "SpecialVoice"
\type "Engraver_group"
\consists "Note_heads_engraver"
\hide NoteHead
}
}
\score {
\new Staff <<
\new Voice \relative c'' { c2 r }
\new SpecialVoice \relative g' { g2. g4 }
>>
}
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
