David Kastrup wrote
> Should we stick with that and just drop the name of the property
> altogether?  It does not seem like it has been missed all that much...

I prefer being able to set the option. For me, the default is much too
rough. If it is a matter of computation speed, a user-settable property can
be tuned to a user's system. Back when we had this option, I had a fairly
slow system and had no problem with the quantizing set at 32. Now, I would
go for an even closer approximation. The elegance is missed on a daily
basis.

DavidC



--
Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Dev-f88644.html

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to