madMuze <[email protected]> writes: > David Kastrup wrote >> Should we stick with that and just drop the name of the property >> altogether? It does not seem like it has been missed all that much... > > I prefer being able to set the option. For me, the default is much too > rough. If it is a matter of computation speed, a user-settable property can > be tuned to a user's system. Back when we had this option, I had a fairly > slow system and had no problem with the quantizing set at 32. Now, I would > go for an even closer approximation. The elegance is missed on a daily > basis.
So you "missed the elegance" more than 2000 times and never once reported it? Because that's what the list archives of user list, developer list, and bug list say about "skyline-quantizing". It seems the removal is predicated on <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2011-12/msg00671.html>. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
