madMuze <[email protected]> writes: >> David Kastrup wrote >>So you "missed the elegance" more than 2000 times and never once >>reported it? Because that's what the list archives of user list, >>developer list, and bug list say about "skyline-quantizing". > > Indeed, I gave it up for lost.
There is not a single message to be found from you regarding that in any of the archives. It seems you gave up before lifting a finger. It's not like there is an authoritive discussion about that property that would suggest it being closed matter either. > In all that time, there have been more pressing issues for LilyPond > development. But, as 2.20 now seems imminent and you are cleaning this > part of the code up, if there's a way to get it back, I'd love to have > it. Thank you! It's definitely not material fit for reentering for 2.20. It would require documentation, testing, documentation translations. That's not last-minute stuff. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
