Reading my way through Behind Bars by Elaine Gould, I'm trying to replicate
some of the examples in LilyPond. One of them contains a tie over a system
break:
\version "2.18.2"
\relative c'' {
r2. fis,4~ | \break
fis8 a16 fis r8 r2 \bar "|."
}
LP puts a sharp in front of the first f# in measure 2 as well as the second
one. According to Gould repeating an accidental twice in a bar in close
succession is redundant (and I think I agree with her). To hide the second
sharp, I've put \once \override Accidental #'transparent = ##t in front of
it. Is this the preferred way of doing hiding that sharp?
I don't consider this a bug per se, but maybe LP can programmed to avoid
repeating accidentals in close succession in upcoming versions?
Sven
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user