2015-10-08 15:40 GMT+02:00 Sven <[email protected]>: > Reading my way through Behind Bars by Elaine Gould, I'm trying to replicate > some of the examples in LilyPond. One of them contains a tie over a system > break: > > \version "2.18.2" > > \relative c'' { > r2. fis,4~ | \break > fis8 a16 fis r8 r2 \bar "|." > } > > > LP puts a sharp in front of the first f# in measure 2 as well as the second > one. According to Gould repeating an accidental twice in a bar in close > succession is redundant (and I think I agree with her). To hide the second > sharp, I've put \once \override Accidental #'transparent = ##t in front of > it. Is this the preferred way of doing hiding that sharp? > > I don't consider this a bug per se, but maybe LP can programmed to avoid > repeating accidentals in close succession in upcoming versions? > > Sven
Is a tied note with Accidental after line-break "in close succession"? Opinions differ. Anyway, the documented method to use: \override Accidental.hide-tied-accidental-after-break = ##t Cheers, Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
