Am 08.10.2015 um 15:40 schrieb Sven:
> Reading my way through Behind Bars by Elaine Gould, I'm trying to
> replicate some of the examples in LilyPond. One of them contains a tie
> over a system break:
>
> \version "2.18.2"
>
> \relative c'' {
> r2. fis,4~ | \break
> fis8 a16 fis r8 r2 \bar "|."
> }
>
>
> LP puts a sharp in front of the first f# in measure 2 as well as the
> second one. According to Gould repeating an accidental twice in a bar
> in close succession is redundant (and I think I agree with her). To
> hide the second sharp, I've put \once \override Accidental
> #'transparent = ##t in front of it. Is this the preferred way of doing
> hiding that sharp?
>
Actually I'm not sure about the proper solution or whether it's a bug
(as David Kastrup suggested).
But to hide the accidental manually you should use \once \omit
Accidental instead of overriding #'transparent. Setting an object
transparent will hide it but keep the space in place (so you'll probably
see an unwanted gap instead.
\hide is an alias for what you did, and \omit is an alias for \override
Accidental #'stencil = ##f.
HTH
Urs
> I don't consider this a bug per se, but maybe LP can programmed to
> avoid repeating accidentals in close succession in upcoming versions?
>
> Sven
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
