Am 18.09.2016 um 15:38 schrieb Simon Albrecht: > On 18.09.2016 15:15, Kieren MacMillan wrote: >>> And finally with a better user interface >> Under what circumstances would you NOT want the end of one curve to >> match precisely the beginning of the next one? >> If “none”, then I would say an even better user interface would not >> require typing that set of coordinates twice. > > I thought about that too – it also makes the data structure less > complicated if it’s a list of seven pairs. I added the new version to > the LSR <http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=1045>, awaiting approval.
There's another improvement I'm right now experimenting with: Not having to type the second control point of the second spline but calculating that mirroring it from the third one of the first spline. I noticed that the compound slur had a noticeable angle there, so this improvement will not only require one point less to type (and determine) but also ensure a smooth turning point. After that I would like to suggest looking for a solution that will enable passing the control points as offsets against the default (non-compound) slur, like \shape does. Urs > > Best, Simon > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
