Am 18. Oktober 2016 06:57:46 MESZ, schrieb Vaughan McAlley <vaug...@mcalley.net.au>: >On 17 October 2016 at 13:00, Javier Ruiz-Alma <jav...@ruiz-alma.com> >wrote: >> >> The concern with fixing the first segment via \shape is the >correction would be useful when the slur is broken, but undesirable >when not. We typeset the same source with different paper sizes, so >there's a real chance fix, or no fix, one of the versions will show an >undesirable slur shape. Forcing or preventing a system break is >non-ideal either. >>
If you are dealing with a fixed set of alternative breaks you can use either manual breaks wrapped in \tag or work with the page-layout package (https://github.com/openlilylib/page-layout). Having a function like \ifAtBreak would of course very useful, not only for slurs. Maybe someone has already done such a thing? Urs > >The second set of control points in \shape has to do double duty >depending on whether it is at the end of the slur or at a line break. >Perhaps more useful would be \shape taking the first point of the >first group and the last point of the last group if the slur is not >broken. > ><wishfulthinking>Even better would be the ability to apply a totally >different set of points depending on the line breaking. This would be >trickier as a slur spanning three bars could potentially break in two >different places.</wishfulthinking> It would potentially make things >quite complicated. > >Vaughan > >_______________________________________________ >lilypond-user mailing list >lilypond-user@gnu.org >https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user