On 5 October 2017 at 01:05, Thomas Morley <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2017-10-04 17:53 GMT+02:00 Gianmaria Lari <[email protected]>: > > On 4 October 2017 at 17:15, Malte Meyn <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Am 04.10.2017 um 17:11 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: > >>> > >>> Is there any \break like command to avoid to use two \justify? > >> > >> > >> Use \justify-string instead. Empty lines make line breaks: > > > > [...] > > > > Yes, I saw \justify-string and it works but I wonder if it existed > something > > more.... natural, like a \break or a command with the lilypond syntax > (and > > not scheme syntax with #). > > > > The reason I'm so picky it's because I'm thinking to the day when I will > > suggest lilypond as engraving program to other persons. I will not > propose > > it to programmers and would like to avoid (each time is possible) to use > > special syntax that I have to explain etc. etc. > > > > Thank you, g. > > Well, you could do: > > \markup { > \column { > \line \bold \smallCaps { Note } > \justify-string > #"L'articolazione d'elezione per lo staccato รจ quella del braccio, o > nel > caso di parti rapide, del polso. \n > Nello staccato, braccio, mano e dita sono un tutt'uno ed agiscono in > modo > compatto senza scomporsi e senza articolazioni intermedie." > } > } > > Ofcourse \n _is_ scheme-syntax ;) > Uhmm... in that case I prefer to use two consecutive \justify. But \n is good to know. I will keep it in my arsenal :) By the way why \justify-string use the scheme syntax and it is not a first class citizen of lilypond language? Thank you, g.
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
