On 5 October 2017 at 09:28, Thomas Morley <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2017-10-05 6:56 GMT+02:00 Gianmaria Lari <[email protected]>: > > On 5 October 2017 at 01:05, Thomas Morley <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> 2017-10-04 17:53 GMT+02:00 Gianmaria Lari <[email protected]>: > >> > On 4 October 2017 at 17:15, Malte Meyn <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Am 04.10.2017 um 17:11 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: > >> >>> > >> >>> Is there any \break like command to avoid to use two \justify? > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Use \justify-string instead. Empty lines make line breaks: > >> > > >> > [...] > >> > > >> > Yes, I saw \justify-string and it works but I wonder if it existed > >> > something > >> > more.... natural, like a \break or a command with the lilypond syntax > >> > (and > >> > not scheme syntax with #). > >> > > >> > The reason I'm so picky it's because I'm thinking to the day when I > will > >> > suggest lilypond as engraving program to other persons. I will not > >> > propose > >> > it to programmers and would like to avoid (each time is possible) to > use > >> > special syntax that I have to explain etc. etc. > >> > > >> > Thank you, g. > >> > >> Well, you could do: > >> > >> \markup { > >> \column { > >> \line \bold \smallCaps { Note } > >> \justify-string > >> #"L'articolazione d'elezione per lo staccato รจ quella del braccio, o > >> nel > >> caso di parti rapide, del polso. \n > >> Nello staccato, braccio, mano e dita sono un tutt'uno ed agiscono in > >> modo > >> compatto senza scomporsi e senza articolazioni intermedie." > >> } > >> } > >> > >> Ofcourse \n _is_ scheme-syntax ;) > > > > > > Uhmm... in that case I prefer to use two consecutive \justify. But \n is > > good to know. I will keep it in my arsenal :) > > Keep in mind: \n is valid input only as part of strings. > > > By the way why \justify-string use the scheme syntax and it is not a > first > > class citizen of lilypond language? > > Thank you, g. > > Not sure what you mean. I don't know what a "first class citizen of > lilypond language" might be. > Why \justify-string use the scheme-syntax and not the lilypond syntax? g.
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
