On 5 October 2017 at 10:09, David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote: > Gianmaria Lari <[email protected]> writes: > > > On 5 October 2017 at 01:05, Thomas Morley <[email protected]> > wrote: > [...] > > By the way why \justify-string use the scheme syntax and it is not a > first > > class citizen of lilypond language? > > Huh? Can you spell out anything that you would expect from a "first > class citizen of LilyPond language" that does not work with > \justify-string ? >
I'm sorry it's just my wrong understanding of #. As I written few minutes ago, "For me an expression starting with # introduce an escamotage to do something not yet part of lilypond. Sorry." Thank you, g.
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
