>>>>> "lyuser" == lyuser thegrue <[email protected]> writes:
>> If you know exactly what the layout will be, and it really is just
>> a few measures of split, and you're never going to reuse the
>> material in a different format, then you should probably just use
>> \new Staff at the moment you need it. There are examples of this
>> all over the web (docs, LSR, probably Scores of Beauty, etc.).
lyuser> This would be what I need :) Unfortunately, I'm too
lyuser> dumb. Sorry, I'm a c, c++, c#, python, ruby, latex and many
lyuser> other - developer, but the lilypond syntax manages to confuse
lyuser> me every time. I'm happy to set simple scores with lilypond
lyuser> and I really like it - but often, I just don't get it.
Something like this:
\version "2.18.0"
tune=\relative c'' {
\time 4/4
\key c \major
g a b c |
c1
}
alto = \relative c'' {
c4 d c e
}
tenor = \relative c' {
c4 b a g |
}
bass = \relative c {
c4 g e c
}
\score {
\new Staff {
\tune
<<
\new Voice { \voiceOne \alto }
\new Voice { \voiceTwo \tenor }
\new Staff { \clef "F" \bass }
>>
}
}
Peter C
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
