Yes I get that but there were no resulting output files.

-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Holmes <m...@philholmes.net> 
Sent: 07 March 2018 14:33
To: peter.gen...@sunscales.myzen.co.uk; 'David Kastrup' <d...@gnu.org>;
Karlin High <karlinh...@gmail.com>
Cc: Lilypond <lilypond-user@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Frescobaldi sudden failures on all machines

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Karlin High" <karlinh...@gmail.com>
To: <peter.gen...@sunscales.myzen.co.uk>; "'David Kastrup'" <d...@gnu.org>
Cc: "Lilypond" <lilypond-user@gnu.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2018 2:17 PM
Subject: Re: Frescobaldi sudden failures on all machines


> On 3/7/2018 8:08 AM, peter.gen...@sunscales.myzen.co.uk wrote:
>> Faulting application path: c:\Program Files
>> (x86)\LilyPond\usr\bin\lilypond-windows.exe
>
> Does it make a difference if you use lilypond.exe,
> instead of lilypond-windows.exe?
> -- 
> Karlin High
> Missouri, USA


It should do.

http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/usage/command_002dline-usage

"Note to Windows users: By default lilypond.exe outputs all progress 
information to the command window, lilypond-windows.exe does not and returns

a prompt, with no progress information, immediately at the command line. The

'-dgui' option can be used in this case to redirect output to a log file."

--
Phil Holmes 


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to