On 6/14/2018 12:47 PM, Aaron Hill wrote:
On 2018-06-13 16:15, Torsten Hämmerle wrote:
There is only one complication I can think of: if there are several
markups/scripts, our "spacer" markup may push the other objects away
from
the stave, but then again, one use outside-staff-priority or, if there's
already a TextScript markup, use this by changing its vertical extents.
Torsten,
Would it make more sense to use \with-dimensions to ensure the markup
has minimal size? Consider:
%%%%
\version "2.19.81"
<<
\new Staff {
\repeat unfold 40 { c''1 }
d'1_\markup \with-dimensions #'(0 . 8) #'(0 . 8) " "
\repeat unfold 40 { c''1 }
}
\new Staff {
\repeat unfold 40 { c''1 }
a''1
\repeat unfold 40 { c''1 }
}
>>
%%%%
As I understand it, this will result in a markup that occupies a
single point, which should have less chance of colliding with other
neighboring markup.
Aaron,
I don't understand. I think that would be a big chunk vs. a small space.
(See attached)
i.e.
#'(0 . 0) #'(0 . 8) " "
instead of
#'(0 . 8) #'(0 . 8) " "
is a huge difference in space....right?
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
