>
> but it would likely not be
> easy to implement properly.
>
That's what I figured… It's okay, I'll try what Mats and Kieren have
suggested with the tags, and if that turns out to be more work than it's
worth, then I can always just manually pad the variables with rests, I
guess.
Thanks,
Randy
On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 11:52 PM David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
> 智樂喬 <randy.josl...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I'd also like to avoid defining two variables, to keep things a little
> > DRYer.
> >
> > What I imagine might be idea would be a function which works similarly to
> > skip-of-length, but takes an argument to subtract a specified length from
> > the variable. I imagined something like the following:
> >
> > #{skip-of-length (- (ly:length-of partA) (ly:make-moment 1/4))) \partB
> >
> > And then put that in a function to make it more compact and easy to use.
>
> It won't give you multi-measure rests padded with ordinary rests. It
> might be a great addition to multi-measure rests if they self-padded
> with ordinary rests for incomplete measures but it would likely not be
> easy to implement properly.
>
> --
> David Kastrup
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
