Why not add it to lilypond proper? I think that we would want to be careful about property names (perhaps with an underline-details property to minimize namespace pollution), but I think it would make a great addition to Lilypond.
Carl From: Urs Liska <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, October 17, 2019 at 3:19 AM To: Andrew Bernard <[email protected]>, Thomas Morley <[email protected]> Cc: Pierre Perol-Schneider <[email protected]>, Aaron Hill <[email protected]>, lilypond-user <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Double-underline markup Please go ahead Andrew. In OLL this should be a submodule below oll-misc.text. Best Urs 17. Oktober 2019 11:16, "Andrew Bernard" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]?to=%22andrew%20bernard%22%20%[email protected]%3e>> schrieb: Now this is great. I can volunteer to put this in Openlilylib if all you authors do not object. Perhaps somebody can make and LSR snippet also. I personally find OLL much more convenient. but I accept arguments in favour of LSR also. Can go in both. Andrew
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
