On Sat 19 Oct 2019 at 14:22:35 (+1100), Andrew Bernard wrote: > I have not seen anything get added to lilypond proper for a long time. I > may be wrong, but it's immensely difficult to get changes to core it would > seem. Fair enough too. That's why openlilylib exists. > > But in fact, while I think this is neat code, I personally strongly > disapprove of underlining, single or double, being a dreary minded > classical typographer myself, and underlining is generally frowned upon > anyway in fine printing (maybe music is not fine printing?) So I would not > actually want to see this encouraged, even though I can see people have > uses for it.
Well, … … … "It's something I - and others - wish lilypond could do, and whether you agree with the practice or not, it's valid I believe to want to be able to duplicate handwritten MSS where the composer considers this important." :) Cheers, David. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
