> There's may be one extra paren in there because it threw a syntax error.
Yes, sorry. > Is that a proper fix, or is something else wrong? I wouldn't call it a “proper” fix because it's a bit too dependent on details that can easily change (specifically, whether the default `NoteName` text is a markup that `markup->string` works well on). That's why I recommend `noteNameFunction` instead, it's also simpler.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
