Valentin Villenave <[email protected]> writes: > On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 9:45 AM, David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote: >> Lilypond would see if that were the case. > > What, are you implying that LilyPond should decide that > > #1: > a~ b > > ...means a slur
Means bad input. Configurable to be treated as a slur to b. > BUT > > #2: > \set tieWaitForNote = ##t > a~ b c d | e1 | a, > > ...means a tie Means a tie, as indicated by the user. > BUT > > #3: > a~ b c d > [insert 42 measures here without an a] > a > > ...doesn't actually mean a tie, but should be treated as a slur > instead? Means bad input. Configurable to be treated as a slur to b. > This seems haphazard to me. Perhaps I misunderstood your comment? Perhaps. I don't see the haphazardness. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
